
Arius
Alexandrian presbyter whose teaching that the Son was a created being sparked the Arian controversy. Condemned at Nicaea (325). Heretic.
Why Arius matters
Arius is on this site because the church can't tell its story without him. He was an Alexandrian priest who taught that the Son was created by the Father — that there was a 'when' when the Son was not. It was a tidy solution to the problem of how Jesus can be God without there being two Gods, and it nearly won. Half the empire's bishops backed some version of it for fifty years after Nicaea condemned him in 325. Athanasius and the Cappadocians had to fight him for two generations. The Nicene Creed exists in the form it does because of Arius. You can't understand 'one in being with the Father' without knowing what it was rejecting.
Chain to Jesus
Loading…
Common questions
- Who was Arius?
- Arius (256–336) — Alexandrian presbyter whose teaching that the Son was a created being sparked the Arian controversy. Condemned at Nicaea (325). Heretic.
- Who did Arius oppose?
- Alexander of Alexandria, Athanasius of Alexandria, and Cyril of Jerusalem.
Sources for biography
- Athanasius, De Synodis 15-16 primary
- Socrates Scholasticus, Hist. Eccl. 1.5-1.9 primary
- Theodoret, Hist. Eccl. 1.2-1.4 primary
documented connections(4)
- opposed (incoming) Alexander of AlexandriaAlexander first condemned Arius and excommunicated him c. 318.Socrates Scholasticus, Hist. Eccl. 1.5-6 · Theodoret, Hist. Eccl. 1.3-4
- opposed (incoming) Athanasius of AlexandriaAthanasius's life work was the refutation of Arianism.Athanasius, Orationes contra Arianos
- knew of (incoming) Eusebius of NicomediaEusebius of Nicomedia was Arius's chief patron and protector after his condemnation.Theodoret, Hist. Eccl. 1.5 · Sozomen, Hist. Eccl. 1.15
- opposed (incoming) Cyril of JerusalemCyril's Catechetical Lectures defend the Nicene faith and oppose Arian subordinationism, and he subscribed the Nicene-Constantinopolitan creed at the council of 381.Cyril of Jerusalem, Catecheses 4.7; 11; 15 · Theodoret, Hist. Eccl. 2.26